Writer Aspyr Media has claimed that the cancelled KotOR 2 Nintendo Change DLC on the middle of a class-action lawsuit was right down to a third-party objection.
The Change port’s announcement trailer, which was printed a few weeks forward of its June 2022 launch and is viewable beneath, acknowledged that the Restored Content material DLC was “coming quickly”, and Aspyr subsequently stated it might arrive within the third quarter of 2022.
Nonetheless, in June 2023, Aspyr introduced that plans to launch the DLC had been cancelled. As compensation, it supplied prospects who purchased the sport the possibility to obtain certainly one of seven different video games freed from cost, together with KOTOR 2 on Steam.
Now, Axios stories that Aspyr co-CEO Ted Saloch stated, “Aspyr believed it might be capable of launch the content material, however a 3rd occasion objected and Aspyr was unable to take action.”
Aspyr has additionally moved to have a class-action lawsuit dismissed, each final month and this month. A listening to on Aspyr’s movement to dismiss the case is ready for the tip of the month.
“Regardless of their failure to launch KOTOR’s Restored Content material DLC, Defendants refused to provide refunds to purchasers of KOTOR,” reads a category motion lawsuit filed in July by Malachi Mickelonis “individually and on behalf of all others equally located”, which was noticed by The Gamer.
“Plaintiff felt utterly duped and was upset as a result of he had relied on Defendants’ representations that the Restored Content material DLC could be launched for KOTOR,” it reads. “Actually, Plaintiff didn’t even play KOTOR after buying it, as a substitute selecting to attend till the Restored Content material DLC was launched. However Defendants by no means did.
“Plaintiff would doubtlessly be taken with buying different video games with Restored Content material DLC from Defendants’ sooner or later if they’ve the marketed content material, are usually not deceptively marketed, and accordingly priced at honest market worth with out being artificially inflated because of the misleading promoting.”
The plaintiff is looking for a trial by jury, an order awarding attorneys’ charges and prices, and additional aid “together with, however not restricted to, the treatment of disgorgement”. The defendants have till October 4 to reply to the lawsuit.
