Name of Responsibility: Fashionable Warfare III (no, not the 2011 shooter of the identical identify with out the Roman numerals) simply launched, and it’s had an fascinating few days. On high of getting what many are saying is without doubt one of the collection’ worst campaigns and getting review-bombed by the general public, Sledgehammer Video games’ newest entry of Activision’s franchise is on observe to be the collection’ worst-reviewed recreation in its 20-year historical past.
As identified by VGC, Fashionable Warfare III is sitting at a middling 50 out of 100 on evaluation mixture web site Metacritic, placing it a whopping 23 factors under the common evaluation rating of 2021’s Name of Responsibility: Vanguard, which beforehand held the worst-reviewed title with a 73. Metacritic relies on common critic scores, and MWIII has 33 critiques as of this writing—on condition that the sport is just some days outdated , extra critiques are probably. However the consumer rating is an abysmal 1.5 on a scale from 1 to 10—a few of which can be from review-bombing, as participant critiques are probably dropping a 0 or 1 rating to voice their grievances, however general, the sentiment round Fashionable Warfare III is an all-time low for the collection.
Purchase Name of Responsibility: Fashionable Warfare III: Amazon | Greatest Purchase | GameStop
Kotaku doesn’t rating video games in our critiques, however we do have Fashionable Warfare III marketing campaign impressions, by which Claire Jackson referred to as it “at greatest a internet impartial expertise that feels rushed, and a boring waste of charismatic characters at worst.” All of this comes after studies that Fashionable Warfare III’s improvement was rushed to get the sport out in 2023 after alleged blended messaging from administration in regards to the scope of the mission.
Should you’re in any respect confused about what’s occurring with Name of Responsibility’s Fashionable Warfare subseries since you thought Fashionable Warfare 3 got here out a decade in the past, take a look at this useful explainer.
